Please view our website with vertical orientation instead.

A 232-page research report which throws light on the state of formal centre-based and home-based care for seniors in Singapore, acknowledges strengths, showcases innovations, identifies unmet needs and suggests recommendations. It looks at four aspects: the overall care landscape, including demand and supply of services; financing; human resource capabilities; and care quality and governance.

A sequel to the Foundation’s 2016 study on nursing homes, Care Where You Are flags the high costs of day-centre and home-care services, which can amount to $900-$2,200 per month, before subsidies. For the severely disabled at home, care can cost $3,100 per month, well above the median cost of care in a charity-run nursing home. Despite the importance of ageing at home, only 2.5 per cent of the Ministry of Health’s Budget – or $240 million – was spent on home and daycare services in FY 2016, the latest year for which figures are available. Significantly, long term care is expensive not just in Singapore, but in almost all advanced ageing nations. While acknowledging improvements in recent years – such as a rapid boost in capacity and innovative care models – the report recommends recalibrating healthcare budgets to increase public spending on community care, strengthening long term care insurance further and capping the fund-raising burden on non-profit care providers. It adds that Singapore needs to develop a more robust and transparent governance framework to oversee training and accreditation and openly audit on-the-job capabilities and the quality of care delivered to clients. Finally, the report underscores the need to catalyse informed public discussions on what kind of care system Singaporeans want and how much they are willing to pay for it.

This report was researched and authored by Associate Professors Elaine Ho and Shirlena Huang from the Department of Geography, National University of Singapore.

Other findings:
A growing burden on charities to help lower-income meet co-payment amounts, the lack of regulatory oversight on private providers and affordable respite care options. The authors also warn that many seniors may be under-insured for long term care and some may be foregoing care because they are unwilling to pay and are unsure of the quality and effectiveness of the options on offer.

Explore our focuses